Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willow, Arizona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. This discussion was one of a large number of disruptive, retaliatory nominations of articles from (see WP:ANI), made in such quick succession that they cannot have individually determined that there is a reason for deletion. If there are other editors in good standing that think this article should be deleted, please feel free to open a new discussion. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 06:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Willow, Arizona

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article does not meet WP:NGF. Subject lakcs WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. Not an encyclopedic topic. ~  Pog ing  Juan  05:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they disagreed with an edit I made on one of the articles they created. Onel 5969  TT me 09:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as it stands now. We know next to nothing about the place other than its altitude and location. Population? History? Official status? All missing. Per GEOLAND, a GNIS entry isn't enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. Shellwood (talk) 14:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Strong delete There is no basis to keep this. A look at the coordinates on Google Maps shows a nearby ranch, but no basis for the mass-produced claim that this is a notable populated place. The GNIS reveals that the name was entered from the Forest Service rather than topo maps (it does not appear on older ones). A newer map does have this site labeled with an elevation benchmark near the Bar Eleven Ranch, but there is again no basis to call this a populated place, much less a notable one. Reywas92Talk 15:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence of a legally recognized populated place as required by GEOLAND, and no information beyond name and coordinates. –dlthewave ☎ 18:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.