Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willowbrook Mall (Houston, Texas)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 12:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Willowbrook Mall (Houston, Texas)


This article was speedy-deleted as CSD G11 spam. A DRV consensus overturned. This matter is submitted to AfD for full consideration, in particular concerning WP:V requirements. This is a procedural listing, so I abstain. Xoloz 17:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN mall. If WP:CORP applies, it fails to meet the criteria in any real significant way. Just because one can prove it exists (until it's demolished) does not make it encyclopedic. It's just a mall. Agent 86 19:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Malls are important parts of communities. They are no different than individual companies, skyscrapers, colleges, etc. --- RockMFR 22:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * keep this one please article is very good and has sources too plus it should meet corp guideline Yuckfoo 22:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, verifiable. JYolkowski // talk 22:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn advert. Nothing in the article suggests notable. meshach 01:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- this mall is an important facility in the Willowbrook area of Houston. Postoak 01:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Remedial actions - I've added a few references and fixed a few problems. The article is now part of WikiProject Houston. This is a new article and should be allowed some time for development. Thank you for your consideration Postoak 22:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Agent 86. Leuko 01:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I might switch over to a "Keep" if more references could be provided which showed the mall's notability, but as it stands, there's not enough. --Elonka 03:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in the article asserts that it's any different from any other mall, and I don't believe malls are noteworthy by default. The reference is a dead link, and searching the newspaper's online archive does not turn up an article with the headline mentioned. Shimeru 05:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Its gross leasable area shows it to be a regional mall rather than a local mall. Edison 18:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge per WP:LOCAL, no evidence of notability outside of the local region provided. Yet more mallcruft.  Xtifr tälk 20:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:RockMFR comment above. &mdash;RJN 23:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:Postoak comment above. &mdash; Clipper471 16:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment — Willowbrook Mall has been cited in a headline as "a popular mall." Also, the mall has been one of Houston's top five mall in both square footage and return per square foot.Popular mall sells for $145 million Houston Business Journal, March 30, 2001. Clipper471 17:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Article would benefit from expansion and reformatting, but it meets the reliably sourced verifiable material required by WP:CORP for inclusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alansohn (talk • contribs) 16:45, December 3, 2006
 * Keep. Rebecca 02:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sourced and verifiable. --Oakshade 23:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 'delete "top 5" for a city is not notable, and neither is the mere word "popular" If it weren't it wouldn't be in business.All successful malls are popular. DGG 01:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.