Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willowbrook Mall (Wayne, New Jersey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Willowbrook Mall (Wayne, New Jersey)
Minor mall, non-notable, fails WP:CORP PresN 15:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fer crying out loud, this isn't even an attempt at an encyclopedic article.  Tychocat 18:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Yeah, the article isn't that great, but it is a notable mall. Of course, I say this while living in northern New Jersey. But with that said, it's easily one of the most popular malls in NJ, and it's considerably larger than many NJ malls with articles (including my local mall, the Livingston Mall. In fact, even though I live 45 minutes from it (as opposed to less than 15 from Livingston and a few other malls, including The Mall at Short Hills), it's pretty much the only mall that anyone who isn't wealthy goes to. And, as stated in the article, it contains the majority of stores anyone in the Northeast could possibly expect to see in a mall. -- Kicking222 19:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, close to home... :) Merge to General Growth Properties, obviously... - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as above. JYolkowski // talk 22:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is no evidence of meeting WP:CORP. GRBerry 03:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep at 1.5 million sq. ft. of selling area, it's the second largest mall in the state (not minor) and one of the earliest fully-enclosed large scale malls (notable). Article meets WP:CORP, without any explanation of what criteria are not being met. Alansohn 22:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment For notability standards like WP:CORP, an assertion of not meeting the standard is an assertion of not meeting all of the criteria. Notability criteria are usually written in the form (A or B or C or D), sometimes, as in WP:CORP, in the form ((A not including A1 and not including A2) or B or C).  If you wish to say that it meets the standard, it is most helpful to show (with evidence) which criteria it does meet.  I've yet to encounter a private company that met the second, and it can't meet the third, so really the independent published works standard is the one at hand for a mall.  GRBerry 02:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please it meets corp guideline and is a notable mall Yuckfoo 19:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.