Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willy Perez-Feria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Willy Perez-Feria

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

blatant selfpromo. Effectively an unsourced BLP... The Banner talk 23:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete COI is a good reason.--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete My online search produced no evidence that this person is actually notable. The current version of the article is massively promotional, packed full of name dropping and such unreferenced prose gems as "Perez-Feria is currently part of 2 time Billboard Magazine's Producer of the Decade 1990-2010 superstar producer/songwriter and dear friend Rudy Perez’s all-star songwriting/production/instruction team working for IDA (Inspire & Develop Artists) an educational program for aspiring recording artists based out of Miami, Florida." If by chance, a couple of good sources are discovered and the article is kept, this article should have every single unreferenced claim pruned away. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Has anyone ever made an article about themselves that wasn't so obvious. Don't they know to actually follow wiki format by looking at how others pages are. Don't use words like popular either, lol. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment The writer of this article is new, just like me. The tone was wrong and he listed no references but I spent only 40 minutes of my personal time and edited the article and included the links. I think the article needed a little tlc and a lot less bashing. Everything that's said on it is supported now and I apologize if I got the formatting wrong, like I said I'm new too. But we have to embrace the newbies don't we? The article is factual and the tone is much improved, won't you guys help me fix this article rather than deleting it? I've done what I know how to do, it would be great if someone else could help me save it from deletion by formatting it properly. Thank you in advance. WhatWillYourVerseBe (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, maybe stubify (when proper references can be found). There is a list of links available on the talkpage (I moved them from the article).  There may be something there that shows notability, though it looks this is just a list of mentions.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 03:37, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.