Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilma Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 02:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Wilma Johnson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There does not seem sufficient reliable independent sources for notability, and her work is not in the permanent collection of museums  DGG ( talk ) 01:00, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The performance art collective of which she was a founder, Neo Naturists, is reasonably notable. I find less to show her separate notability, but her Surf Mama project got some attention on BBC Radio 4, and  The Mail on Sunday published a long feature written by her .  Maybe a merge/redirect back to Neo Naturists would be appropriate unless and until more individual coverage shows up. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

--mathilde761 (talk) 16:46, 25 April 2014
 * Comment. Due to the imminent publication of Wilma Johnson's memoir Surf Mama there will be a substantial amount of accompanying press and therefore we have reason to believe this entry is notable. She was a founding member of the Neo Naturists and although perhaps less well-known than other of her contemporaries nevertheless played an important role in this movement.
 * WP:CRYSTALBALL speculation of potential future press coverage is not evidence of attained notability; and can you clarify your use of the "we" voice? AllyD (talk) 06:38, 27 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  03:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:09, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.