Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilmot Faulkner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:26, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Wilmot Faulkner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can not find any significant coverage in reliable sources for this DJ. Ridernyc (talk) 07:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The artist is notable. He is not a stage performer that you'll get lots of web sources for him. NickAang (talk) 07:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That's wonderful please list coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Ridernyc (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note Article creator has admited to what appears to be paid promotional editing here. Ridernyc (talk) 09:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note - Please, check paid editing and I never admitted that and never intended to create articles that do not meet the wikipedia policy for my own profit. The nominator didn't show any guidance and also received comments from other editors for nominating articles for deletion without researching in depth. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * once again stop talking about me, and provide sourcing please. Also this is the 2nd time now you say you get 4$ an article in one place then say you don't paid in another place. Sources please. Ridernyc (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Please, you should also stop talking about me! Thanks, NickAang (talk) 20:09, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note If you think the links given in reference section are not reliable then explain the reason on the debate. Please, share your views for proposing the deletion. Please, don't just comment that you didn't find any reliable sources etc. If the sources are found non-reliable or no reliable sources are added then admins will do the rightful for the article. Also, you'll not find me arguing with non-reliable sources. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That is the burden of the person creating the article not me. I'm not here to educate you on WP:RS and WP:GNG Again please stop side stepping the issue. Ridernyc (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: As much as the "weekend starter" show on internet hotbotradio is cool, there is no basis for notability.  The more an article looks like a resume for "here's a good dentist in bury st. edmunds", the less likely it is to be appropriate for wikipedia.--Milowent • hasspoken  04:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:GNG. Article has zero reliable independent sources.  Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.