Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete due to failure to meet WP:N and WP:V. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Wilos

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no evidence that this program meets the notability criteria; prod removed without comment by creator. FisherQueen (Talk) 21:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are no references or links that show notability. --Sbluen 00:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of coherent assertion of notability. Someguy1221 04:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Why? I don't understand why would you to delete this page? Could you more explain?. thededer 04:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply It might be helpful for you to read the notability criteria; those are the criteria that all articles on Wikipedia must meet, and in this discussion, we're deciding whether or not this article meets that criteria.  It's possible that it would also be helpful for you to carefully read our conflict of interest guidelines. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 04:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Modifications Modification about notability will be included to the Wilos' description but I would like to say that your article defining them is not very explicit. It could have include some examples for people not used to write Wikipedia articles. It was not our intentions to make one bad.sadasblackmilk 00:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Notability proved Could you tell us the article is meeting global notability requirements or if there is something else to be changed. We'll be glad to do it. Thanks.sadasblackmilk 00:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think blogs and download links are notable. Macktheknifeau 15:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - The article fails to assert any notability. Download links should not be included, as Wikipedia is not for advertising and these links don't establish any notability. Blogs do not establish notability as a lot of editors here consider them non-verifiable, conflict-of-interest, and of low notability themselves. Most importantly, the article is not written in an encyclopedic tone, and does not provide any assertion of notability. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 18:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.