Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilson Wan Sze Chung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:45, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Wilson Wan Sze Chung

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It just has way too much of a feel of a self-promotion article, and I think the notability is questionable — although, obviously, I'd want the community to think about it with me. As for myself, delete. --Nlu (talk) 19:53, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Heavily promotional in tone. A couple of primary source references. Other references are mostly irrelevant and do not relate to the article topic. I can't find anything reliable to establish notability via Google search. Educational and accountancy qualifications are run of the mill Philg88 ♦talk 10:16, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Grossly promotional to the degree it would be a good G-11 CSD candidate. And yeah, the subject seems to lack any kind of encyclopedic notability. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:45, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional and no sign of notability to the standards needed. Amortias (T)(C) 22:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.