Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wimba Sutan Fanosa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. no further discussion of sources following the initial relist, one more keep argument made since second relist. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Wimba Sutan Fanosa

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 05:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Indonesia. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 05:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 19:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I have found a multi-page biography of the subject. The description of him in this article also makes me think other coverage of him exists. EternalNomad (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - in addition to the above two sources, I have also found Bola which is more than a passing mention. His every move seems to be covered quite heavily. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The Bola piece is short, mainly about his wife's pregnancy, and imo trivial. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 01:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: more time to discuss the sources provided Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 03:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, sufficient covering has been provided for passing WP:SPORTCRIT.ZanciD (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * At AFD WP:SPORTCRIT #5 only applies as reason to delete, not to keep - failing it means the article must be deleted, but passing it doesn't indicate notability. BilledMammal (talk) 03:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - sources from and  are probably sufficient for WP:GNG. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.