Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinSEND


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Non-administrator housekeeping close WP:NAC following speedy WP:G7 deletion requested by the author of the page. Msnicki (talk) 14:45, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

WinSEND

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article about a new software package does not provide any independent, reliable sources that demonstrates that it meets Wikipedia's standards for notability Claviere (talk) 08:28, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I added a link to our university page about the conference where our paper accepted as first implementation of SEND for windows notability sara1981 (talk) 02:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:06, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Completely fails WP:GNG due to the  lack of reliable independent secondary sources WP:RS to establish notability WP:N.  Though I appreciate this is a PhD project, there is nonetheless an element of WP:MADEUP at work here: "If you have invented something novel in school, in your university lab, your garage, or the pub, and it has not yet been featured in reliable sources, please do not write about it in Wikipedia."  Msnicki (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note - Article was speedy deleted by a G7 placed by the author. Syrthiss (talk) 13:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.