Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Win & Win


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete A7, G11 by User:Anthony Appleyard; (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 14:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Win & Win

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete as company is not sufficiently notable, lacks sources and article reads as advert. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 23:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.