Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wincest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 22:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Wincest

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I think this article does not belong on Wikipedia. The article just talks about what the article name is, and does not talk about much else, so it should be considered a neologism. Also, pairings as a whole do not belong at Wikipedia at all. ChaosAkita 20:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -- Scientizzle 20:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with prejudice. Looks like a protologism, undoubtedly would be rejected by Wiktionary if we tried to transwiki. Guy (Help!) 22:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lakers 00:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of reliable sources. No Google News hits, no relevant Google News Archive hits, no relevant Google Groups hits. Fan fiction topics need legitimate sources before they can warrant a Wikipedia article. Note, for example, Articles for deletion/Kigo (Kim Possible) and Articles for deletion/Kim shego in which two articles about the same character pairing were deleted. --Metropolitan90 03:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I have no emotional attachment to the subject and expect to be overruled by the large number of delete votes already posted. There does seem to be an anti-slash bias. The article was presented originally as a description of what appears to me to have become one of the more significant pairings in one of the more significant fandoms. Ringbark 18:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * comment I <3 Sandcest in all of its forms in the Naruto fandom, but I would NEVER think of creating an wikipedia entry for it. It's generally un-encyclopedia. Pairings as a whole do not belong on wikpedia, at all, thank you. (P.S. Don't go assuming I have an anti-slash bias. Look here ChaosAkita 21:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * comment Oh sorry, I was careless. I thought you said "I have emotional attachment to the subject". But please keep in mind of what else I have said. ^^ ChaosAkita 21:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.