Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wind-Up Records

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy delete. Deathphoenix 00:48, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wind-Up Records
Delete: No substantial information

Someone should write a real article about Wind-Up Records warpozio 22:31, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * WTF? Speedy delete to clear this mess from the edit history, keep it off of BJAODN and cut Warpozio loose to write a real article. - Lucky 6.9 22:51, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * i second the "wtf", and the Speedy delete. Jdcooper 23:01, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Eh? Speedy.  -- Scott  ei&#960; + 1 = 0  23:09, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Is this some kind of wind-up, mate? Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 23:31, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedily as a personal communication, else as a rant. If someone cares enough to write a WP-friendly article, let them. Wyss 23:50, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted as personal communication. RickK 00:16, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

I had to double check because this was marked as speedied and archived, but the title was a bluelink; so I'm editing this to note that the title was recreated with a valid article, as per Warpozio's suggestion above. As currently written, it is not what was proposed for deletion, so this debate does not need to be reopened. Bearcat 03:45, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.