Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wind Speed in Bangladesh last 42 Years


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:30, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Wind Speed in Bangladesh last 42 Years

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Simply not notable. Unsourced and fails our policies. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think we have articles on wind speeds in other countries, so this one can be safely deleted. --JB Adder | Talk 14:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - If that's not a copyvio, I will smoke an Oliva V salomon. Ditto even if it ain't a copyvio, but I will bet that it is. Unsourced. Even if it were sourced, it is not an encyclopedic topic. Why 42 years? There might be an article to be had List of typhoons since 1900 to strike Bangladesh or something like that, given concrete inclusion parameters and proper sourcing, but this ain't it. Carrite (talk) 15:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with Carrite.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  16:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  16:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete We actually have lots of articles like this and this one is a cruder version of List of Bangladesh tropical cyclones.  But, as the title doesn't seem especially appropriate, I can't see much point in keeping any of it. Warden (talk) 17:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Warden. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, even if it has the answer to life, the universe, and everything in its title. (Well, seriously, the data probably exists elsewhere on here, like on the list Warden pointed out (I should really look before I say stuff like that... Ansh666 21:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)), and there's no real reason to keep a random unencyclopedic list of it anyways.) Ansh666 20:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete very poorly organized article, and wind speed should be in Climate portion of Bangladesh or maybe Climate of Bangladesh. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.  Faizan   -  Let's talk!   13:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I assume the editor chose 42 because the state of Bangladesh came only in 1971. But the title seems very odd to me. Solomon7968 (talk) 18:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.