Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wind and Water: Puzzle Battles (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star  Mississippi  01:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Wind and Water: Puzzle Battles
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was prodded by with rationale of "not notable". However, the article cannot be prodded as it was previously AFD'd. Result of 2008 AFD was "no consensus". The current sourcing seems pretty thin, but I'm mainly doing this procedurally on behalf of the IP who prodded Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:52, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:52, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Per WP:NEXIST. Mobygames page It has a full review in Jeuxvideo, a review in GamesRadar+ (#12 on this list), and Man!ac which is a published magazine. There's also a full write-up in TIGSource which was written by Derek Yu, a highly trusted figure within the video game industry. Therefore easily passes GNG and should not be deleted. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - I say there is still potential that this page can be a notable one within Wikipedia. The main issue that i currently see with the page is that it needs a LOT of massive restructuring and find additional sources that justify the page's viability. Roberth Martinez (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.