Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Windent

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Small medical (dental practice management) software company that has attracted little to no attention from reliable sources. I can see no book mentions, news articles (apart from press releases), scholarly reviews, awards or other things that meet the notability criteria. There appears to be insufficient independent material to write about this company Peripitus (Talk) 02:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 02:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. The first two results, this article and this article are both press releases. The rest of the results are either passing mentions or are unrelated to this company. This company fails Notability (organizations and companies) and Verifiability. Cunard (talk) 02:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep 13 sources on this organization. Ikip (talk) 02:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Few of those relate to this company - some far predate it's foundation. All that I can see are press releases, or passing mentions - Peripitus (Talk) 02:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: The company appears to have fewer than 100 employees and its product does not appear exceptional in any way. Ben (talk) 05:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is the very model of a software package that is unlikely to be noticed outside of a small circle of people interested in managing dental offices.  Any notability guideline that suggests that such a thing could be an encyclopedia subject would appear to require tightening. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.