Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows CE 3.0


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Windows CE. T. Canens (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Windows CE 3.0

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The article provides only few and vague information; there is only one refrence. The topic itself can be better addressed under the main article Windows CE. Similar discussions are ongoing w.r.t. Windows CE 1.0 and Windows CE 2.0. VictorVautier (talk) 14:54, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 19.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  15:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. VictorVautier (talk) 14:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Wrong forum: the nomination lacks deletion rationale. In fact the nominator requests merge, which is not supposed to be discussed in WP:AFD process. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:57, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Windows CE as lacking in depth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect as the previous speaker said Akolyth (talk) 12:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but why delete and not only redirect? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I could compromise on a redirect Akolyth (talk) 09:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.