Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windsong valley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:12, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Windsong valley

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable place. No references at all, and search turns up nothing relevant. Original author very persistent in removing PRODs and refuses to engage in any sort of communication at all; he or she is apparently an SPA. Let's get trid of this for good. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:45, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The best reference I could locate was . One 249 word article in a newspaper 24 years ago doesn't really show notability. Peter Karlsen (talk) 18:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG categorically. — Chromancer  talk/cont 18:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Fails WP:N. moreno oso (talk) 04:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Trivial housing development. Doesn't even rate a mention at the Wildomar, California website or article even though it is supposedly located in that town. --MelanieN (talk) 15:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.