Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windsor Cricket Club (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  17:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Windsor Cricket Club
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Windsor Cricket Club is not in an ECB Premier League, which per WP:CRIC is a criteria English recreational cricket clubs need to fulfill before being considered notable; therefore Windsor Cricket Club is a non-notable cricket club. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The article makes no claim to notability -- the scenic background and royal patron are irrelevant -- and no references are provided to suggest that it's anything other than a respectable, but non-notable, sports club. Jimmy Pitt   talk  18:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The first nomination was thrown out on a technicality. The only sources found during that AfD were local news stories, which do not satisfy WP:ORG. This club does not satisfy the specific notability defined by WP:CRIN, nor that by the wider community WP:N (significant coverage in reliable independent sources).&mdash;User:MDCollins (talk) 22:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7, as non-notable local club. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  05:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Updated the article to include recent publicity and the ECB Clubmark recognition which although we are not currently an ECB Premier League team we are awarded elite club status.''' —Preceding unsigned comment added by  213.123.218.206 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 7 October 2010  — 213.123.218.206 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Altough the IP has updated the article, but didn't add any sources. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  15:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

'''
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Elite status doesn't equal notability. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.