Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windsor Spitfires 2009-10 season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 20:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Windsor Spitfires 2009-10 season

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

1. The subject of the article fails the notability requirements of wp:athlete or the notability requirements of wp:hockey. 2. It is a collection of statistics without an article. (wp:notstats) While other stub articles exist with a potential to be better, this one has no potential to be more relevant. 3. It is an article that fails due to its recentism. The topic of this article may very well be notable in the future. I suggest it be moved to the hockey wikia. &#x0298; alaney2k  &#x0298; ( talk ) 18:24, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  —DJSasso (talk) 18:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Junior team seasons have generally be considered not notable individually and instead redirect to the overall League season article. As such similar articles in the past have been deleted at Afd. -DJSasso (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, this seems like recentism. GoodDay (talk) 21:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete, what's the purpose in deleting articles that are well versed in information? Isn't that the entire purpose of this website? What harm is there in having this up? -Thetoast84
 * Wikipedia is not a sports almanac. Basically we aren't an indiscriminant dumping ground for all information. Only the most notable. The Ice Hockey Wiki would probably be more than willing to take this information because they don't have as stringiant requirements for articles. -DJSasso (talk) 11:29, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have transwiki'd it to the ice hockey wiki at this location. -DJSasso (talk) 19:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks good there, though it has a NHL tag for the team in the infobox. &#x0298; alaney2k  &#x0298; ( talk ) 03:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - It's not an article. It's basically just a list of stats and miscellaneous information. &#x0298; alaney2k  &#x0298; ( talk ) 13:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a sports almanac. Stifle (talk) 14:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability, agree with "WP is not a sports almanac". &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 17:01, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Ice Hockey Wikia. They would love to have this kind of content.  Powers T 15:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Already been done. -DJSasso (talk) 17:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I disagree on NOTALMANAC as a reason for deletion - that is a content issue that could very easily be corrected. However, I'm not sold on season articles below the top levels of any sport. It is something that the hockey wikia is better suited for, imo. Resolute 01:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.