Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wingmen (TV Series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  20:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Wingmen (TV Series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON. TV series to be released. Non-notable right now. While there are many results on Google when you search it, the results do not refer to this particular topic. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - according to a couple of sources (like this one and this one), the pilot has already aired. There's quite a bit about the trademark dispute, but not really "significant coverage" of the show itself.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 22:59, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (relate)  @ 14:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * This is indeed a WP:TOOSOON at this point. The article is relying almost entirely on primary and unreliable sources like its own Facebook profile and IMDb for "referencing", with only a single article about a trademark lawsuit in a properly reliable source — and while that article says that the pilot has aired, I cannot find a single reliable source which confirms what network aired the pilot or when. And those are exactly the two most critically important details that an article about a television show must always be able to provide and source in order to actually qualify it for a Wikipedia article — so if they're impossible to confirm, then the show just ain't there yet. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when the sourcing improves — and no objection to sandboxing it in draftspace, either — but it doesn't qualify for an article until we can at least source what channel airs it. Delete or sandbox. Bearcat (talk) 17:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too soon, and unreliable sources. Nothing to support notability yet.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  00:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.