Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wings (1968 band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no delete !votes. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 10:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Wings (1968 band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This 1968 band is not notable and they didn't do very well. The band only released one album and disbanded before 1968 was over. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 18:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Review from Billboard here. Can't find proof that they charted though. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:44, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Even less successful bands have articles. That there is still documentation available after 45 years says something. BigJim707 (talk) 22:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is also a substantial enough bio at Allmusic and a short entry in Vernon Joynson's Fuzz Acid and Flowers Revisited. --Michig (talk) 06:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdraw: I withdraw this nomination. Enough notability is there for an old band. SL93 (talk) 06:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.