Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wink (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 07:57, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Wink (game)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The only reliable source I found that includes more than a passing mention of this game was this book, but even that is not substantial enough coverage to make this topic eligible for inclusion under the GNG. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  02:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 09:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as not being notable. Tryphaena (talk) 11:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: the above user has been blocked as a sockpuppet of another user. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  01:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. It's clearly real, but does not meet our notability criteria. Lady  of  Shalott  14:27, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  14:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:ITEXISTS, but WP:ITFAILSTHEGNG. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:16, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.