Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winnie Couture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Winnie Couture

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spam article written as an advertisement, which does not belong on Wikipedia per WP:NOTADVERTISING. The notability is borderline at best with most of the sources failing WP:SPIP. Rentier (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep advertising/promo alone is not an issue for AfD per WP:ATD, easily passes WP:NCORP from a search for sources . -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:ATD states that "an article on a notable topic severely fails the verifiability or neutral point of view policies, it may be reduced to a stub, or completely deleted by consensus at WP:AfD". It's up to the participants of this AfD to decide whether the encyclopedia is well served by retaining this promotional piece inserted by an SPA so well-versed in wiki-markup. Rentier (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as per WP:NOTADVERTISING. Not enough independent references to justify notability Wikilover2604 (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment The article can be deleted on the basis of WP:NOTADVERTISING. My thoughts exactly on the vagueness of the notability here for this article. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 10:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, they are either simple name-checks in an article (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or they're company produced announcements/material. -- HighKing ++ 18:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- the sources offered above fail WP:CORPDEPTH being passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. The copy is mostly advert, as in:
 * "Winnie Couture has been featured in publications such as, Modern Brides, Modern Luxury, Brides, The Knot and InStyle Weddings!" Etc.
 * If such content is removed, there won't be much left, and Wikipedia specifically discourages directory-like listings. The company exists, but have not achieved anything significant just yet. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.