Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winning Moves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Winning Moves

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Originally PRODed by Piotrus, which (see 1) I endorsed, but reverted by IP editor with the rationale "take it to AfD". Article links four refs, ref one couldn't be opened, refs 2 and 3 are trivial (too short), and ref 4 is not independent. I don't think this meets GNG, and couldn't find any refs, so I am taking this to AfD. VickKiang (talk) 10:57, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Massachusetts. Shellwood (talk) 12:14, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage required for WP:NCORP. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any references/sources that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 13:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.