Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winnipeg Citizens Coalition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Winnipeg Citizens Coalition

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't verify that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - appears to just have sporadic local coverage —Мандичка YO 😜 19:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG. The scant coverage that exists only shows that the organization was formed and what its goals were.  No coverage seems to exist showing that it actually did anything, never mind anything of note.  The Winnipeg Free Press article cited to prove the Coalition was successful on one occasion doesn't actually mention the Coalition at all. nerdgoonrant (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per WP:ORG, and particularly its WP:AUD restrictions, something like this would need more than purely local media coverage to qualify for an article. A local civic activist group whose only notable success is backing the winning city council candidate in one ward in one election, in a city where city councillors don't get an automatic WP:NPOL pass just for existing as city councillors, is not a strong enough notability claim to make this internationally notable, especially given that the source for Orlikow's victory doesn't mention this group at all. Bearcat (talk) 17:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.