Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston Olde English Bulldogge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 05:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Winston Olde English Bulldogge

 * — (View AfD)

Ye Winston Old English Bulldogge was speedily deleted, ostensibly as a breed failing to assert notability, but dog breeds don't have to pass WP:CSD so the deletion was overturned at deletion review and the discussion now moves here. Note: Please heed WP:CANVASS. This is a procedural nomination, I have no opinion. ~ trialsanderrors 02:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - the history of the breed is located here Headphonos 03:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * AfD is not CSD. ~ trialsanderrors 07:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the total lack of verifiable information and lack of available sourcing. Currently the article has no assertion of notability and the only source is a homepage for the breed. The AKC doesn't register this as a breed, and probably consider them to be nothing more than mixes with consistent characteristics. Searching for the term Winston Olde English Bulldogge brings the Wikipedia article and Wikipedia mirrors as the first results, and the search also returns results for Old English Bulldog, making it almost impossible to differentiate without checking each and every source. If this has been contested so hard, the editor doing the fighting should have produced some sources by now. Cheers, Lankybugger 14:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lankybugger, try "'Winston Olde English Bulldogge' -wikipedia" in Google to get all non-Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirror hits; this gets 426 hits, none of which belong to a major kennel club or other reliable source on dogs. Thus, the Winston Bulldogge fails the importants policies of WP:V and WP:RS, so it has to go. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 18:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A paragraph in another article would suffice. Xiner (talk, email) 20:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable type of dog. Edison 20:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of being the principal subject of multiple non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the sole breeder. Guy (Help!) 21:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I searched and searched for this breed while I was waiting for the Deletion Review process to end, and found nothing that indicated to me that the article should be kept. I also searched for this breed while developing my perspective on the Olde English Bulldogge and the Wilkinson Bulldog, respectively kept and deleted recently per AfD. Regards, Keesiewonder 10:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -- This is a "dog peddlers dog" and the citations are to more dog peddlers touting their wares. User:PBurns3711 15 January 2007


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.