Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Winzo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An article about an online gaming firm, with text and references mainly about investment funding and sponsorships, which fall under trivial coverage. The article was previously rejected at AfC, deleted as an expired draft, refunded at the draft creator's request, then moved into mainspace by another account without substantial change. 's AfC rejection text gave a good appraisal: "Sources consist solely of routine business reporting such as raise rounds, sponsorship announcements, etc. We need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources that have chosen to write about this company of their own volition", but was not acted upon. Looking for other sources, there is a 2020 Entrepreneur India item, which is interview-based and clear when it is the company's own claims that are being repeated, and a DNAIndia profile piece describing the company's influencer-based model but I don't see enough to demonstrate attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Companies,  and India. AllyD (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom and my own AfC review. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.