Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wireless Access Platforms for Electronic Communications Services Management (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. There being no opposition to deletion...  Sandstein  17:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Wireless Access Platforms for Electronic Communications Services Management
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Ephemeral project. No independent sources about the project. Does not meet WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 14:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — —Tom Morris (talk) 14:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Ah, bureaucracy! ....a proposed framework for the provision of electronic communications services within a set of frequency bands to be identified and agreed between European Union Member States in which a range of electronic communications networks and electronic communications services may be offered on a technology and service neutral basis, provided that certain technical requirements to avoid interference are met, to ensure the effective and efficient use of the spectrum, and the authorization conditions do not distort competition.....The concept was proposed in May 2004 by the European Commission asked an EU committee "Radio Spectrum Policy Group" to develop an “opinion” on a new approach to wireless policy to be tried in a limited number of bands. In Dec 2007 CEPT's (European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations) European Communications Committee (ECC) issued a draft report, and in March 2008, the European Commission’s Communications Committee (CoCom) expressed a positive opinion on the Draft Commission Recommendation (RSCOM08-1625).  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Bureaucratese is usually translatable into English, if thought worth the trouble. But this isn't actually pure Bureaucratese, but just a list of the bodies considering a report. However, I do not see how we can keep this without some actual information for what happened to the report after 2008.     DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 21:13, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.