Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wireless HDMI (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Wireless HDMI
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unnotable. It is not a standard, technology, or trademark, but rather a colloquial term for several proprietary wireless products and technologies which do not use the term "Wireless HDMI" for obvious trademark reasons (examples: Wireless HD and WHDI standards, LG "Wireless 1080p", Philips "Wireless HDTV Link", Sony "Bravia Wireless Link", Asus "Wireless Display Connectivity", etc.) Dmitry (talk •contibs ) 20:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Disagree. This is an important concept. There should be at least a redirect to something useful on the same topic.Wfzimmerman (talk) 13:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: There is quite a lot in . Dewritech (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - a notable topic with many sources. Tzu Zha Men (talk) 06:12, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per this search. Joe Chill (talk) 14:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.