Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wireless station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07  ( T ) 20:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Wireless station

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dab was made with good intentions, but largely falls flat of the mark. In all existing usage, there is no way for the user to tell which type of wireless station is being made (if it were, it would be more properly piped). No sense in confusing the reader. Ultimately, a bad dab. Primefac (talk) 16:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The content seems reasonable and I'm not understanding the nomination. The point of a dab is to provide the reader with a selection of reasonable alternatives for an ambiguous title.  This page seems to do that just fine. Andrew D. (talk) 18:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * If understand "which type of wireless station is being made", the objection is simply that the disambig page is sufficiently unclear as to the topics linked. Then fix the problems and improve the descriptions. I'm tempted to say Speedy keep. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - another sensible and useful dab page, an obvious keep. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Disambiguation page/Set index that may need slight improvement but still fills a potential requirement. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.