Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisłok Górny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was obvious keep per long-standing precedent of keeping all settlements. Renata (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Wisłok Górny

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Other than the fact that that this village is very old (over 700), I see no reason for it to have it's own page. No sources, no notability, no credibility. Renaissancee (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Snowball keep per long established consensus that all places of human habitation are inherently notable and should have articles. Mjroots (talk) 07:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Obviously keep, but probably best to merge with Wisłok Dolny and Wisłok Wielki.--Kotniski (talk) 13:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.