Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisconsin Drunk Driving


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Drunk driving (United States). – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Wisconsin Drunk Driving

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Serious POV problems, and negligible sourcing. Until It Sleeps 00:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and move to Drunk driving in Wisconsin – Drunk driving in Wisconsin is well-documented via reliable secondary sources, , , and recently , to name just a few. I should also note that Wisconsin has the highest drunk driving rate of any state in the nation, as noted . Clearly a notable topic. Of course, these should be implemented in the article and cleaned up to address the current NPOV/OR issues. MuZemike 00:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.  —MuZemike 00:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * MuZemike: are the metrics cited in the source reliable at all? People say that they do so-and-so, but what they say might be skewed by regional cultural differences - right/wrong? NVO (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * If this topic has potential, the entire article has to be re-written from scratch. Otherwise, delete. Hairhorn (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. A mess of an article, and no reason for a separate article on the topic. If there's anything worth saying about drunk driving in Wisconsin, say it in Drunk driving (United States). Fences and windows (talk) 03:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked at the sources. None say anything about notability. I'm not sure if WP has a policy advising against listing the penalties for traffic violations applicable in a particular location, but common sense indicates that it is not the basis for a worthwhile encyclopedic article. Johnuniq (talk) 11:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect into Drunk driving (United States) - there is some useful information, but probably not enough for a tiny stub; the precedent is to merge such DUI stubs into one of the larger such articles. Bearian (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as above.Tyrenon (talk) 02:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Drunk driving (United States). Contains a lot of original research; also, Wisconsin is not particularly notable for drunk driving, at least not enough for an article. There does not seem to be mergeable content in the article. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.