Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisconsin Forensic Coaches Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Wisconsin Forensic Coaches Association

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sources are cited in-article and my own searches have only turned up primary sourcing and a few passing mentions, with no significant third-party coverage. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 00:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting, subject to a previous AFD, Articles for deletion/Wisconsin Forensics Coaches Association. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 00:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Unsurprisingly my own searches produce similar results. Waggers<small  style="color:#080">TALK  12:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Wisconsin. Shellwood (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom. My search turned up nothing, too. I find the keep argument from the previous AfD to be uncovincing (arguing it either as 'very important part of high school' or 'since we have an article on the national organization, chapters should have articles too similar to sports teams in a sports league having articles'). The first is an ILIKEIT argument, and the second falls apart upon inspecting the state of the national article (National Speech and Debate Association, and in 2009 too ) which has doubtful notability; the argument would carry more weight if the organization was more important, thus generating more coverage. — Danre98 ( talk ^ contribs ) 21:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.