Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WiseStamp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

WiseStamp

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It's a web browser extension for social networking, and it definitely exists. However, the article doesn't have sufficient independent references for notability - the TechCrunch review doesn't count toward notability, since it's just a one-time review - and the editor who declined the prod mostly made reference to sources that are just more trivial reviews. Unless there's evidence of real notability, this should be deleted. — Gavia immer (talk) 03:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Like I wrote in the edit summary the extenstion has been covered by more than one reliable sources, that's Wikipedias threshold for notability (Notability (organizations and companies)). Please detail why this isn't notable ("that review doesn't count" and "this is trivial" is vague). In addition, according to the TechCrunch article it had 1 million installs in its first week.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.