Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisetrack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Wisetrack

 * – ( View AfD View log )

notability? Steinhfer (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep and close – The nomination doesn't contain a valid rationale for deletion, per criterion listed at WP:DEL-REASON. AfD is not cleanup. Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete the deletion reason specified - lack of notability - seems to apply. Though I didn't try hard, my search revealed nothing indicating potential success. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 11:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete This just seems to be one company in a field, and the article contains neither references nor evidence of their notability. That said, they have been used as an example in some scaremonging about RFID tracking, but being one example among others doesn't seem strong enough in itself to indicate persistent notability. AllyD (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. No significant coverage found, no claim or indication of notability in the article. It's a shame that this AfD has taken up more effort from editors than was put into writing the article. I don't see any point dragging this out for any longer.--Michig (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.