Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wish (charity) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 14:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Wish (charity)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No consensus over a year ago at AfD - hopefully we can now get a consensus, as this has been waiting for one in CAT:NN for over 11 years. It is a worthy organisation, but I can see no way it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. It’s difficult to search for! I found some RIS here and and I also see other scholarly articles citing their reports so their work has standing in the research community. Mccapra (talk) 04:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep It is a registered and respectable charity which has been called on to testify in Parliament. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:37, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.