Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Witel

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non-notable, now-defunct company. There are no reliable sources currently being used in the article - they are either directory pages or the same press release that was posted on multiple sites and used as multiple sources to try to inflate the reference count. Searching for additional sources turns up nothing in reliable, secondary sources. It does not look like this company was ever notable, and as it does not appear to still be in business, it is doubtful that it ever will gain any. Rorshacma (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: No evidence the company passes WP:NCOMPANY. Old spam/ad. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a search does not raise sufficient sources to establish notability. Mathias (talk) 06:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: A long-term article by a WP:SPA, setting out a start-up company's proposition. The exising sources are poor and my searches are not finding better. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.