Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/With You (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   KEEP. Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

With You (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

LOL page. Can't think of any policy, but just do take a look. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 11:45, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Irregardless of notaility, it is just a spam page. Bonkers The Clown  (Nonsensical Babble) 11:49, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete  Wp:notability is possible, but there are zero references, and zero indication of notability, and little or no encyclopedic content to save.    I took out some of the worst stuff, but is still miles from being an encyclopedia article. North8000 (talk) 12:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC) North8000 (talk) 14:41, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Newly added references change the situation.  Severe issues with the content remain. North8000 (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep if, and only if, someone can get Chinese and/or Singaporean sources that prove it won and got the nominations for the Star Awards 2011 that the article alludes to. Even more so if someone gets some other sources to comment on this particular program series. I would assume that it passes WP:GNG, but it may be hard to prove this. Obviously, if this notability cannot be proved, it has to be deleted. Lukeno94 (talk) 12:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Here's proof that they won the 2011 Star Award for Best Actress.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:24, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I've sourced the awards section in the article as well as turning it into a table rather than just a list.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Good find, and that looks much better now. Lukeno94 (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Much like telenovelas, Asian serial dramas can seem hokey and weird to US audiences, but they're often shockingly popular and culturally notable. How popular?  This one was watched by nearly a million people, which is a big deal in a nation of 5 million.  To put that into perspective, a show viewed by 20% of the US population would be the buzz of the entertainment world... in fact, that's about what American Idol was doing as of season 10. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Andrew Lenahan. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:14, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's won some awards from what must be the Chinese equivalent of the Emmy, so it passes notability guidelines. In all fairness though, I must somewhat defend the original AfD nominator in that the original version of the article was slightly unclear about the awards and searching foreign language sources can be difficult if you don't have a browser that allows for instant translation or copy/paste of Chinese characters.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and it's not a Chinese equivalent, but a Singaporean one. Bonkers The Clown  (Nonsensical Babble) 13:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Reinforcing that note on how bad the article was when it was nominated (and defense of the nomination), there were two other large problematic things present when nominated which I subsequently took out. One was an entire large section written in Chinese, the other was a ersatz "references" section (on an article which had ZERO citations and ZERO real references) which consisted only of a Wikipedia template listing the filmography and discography of an actress in the series. North8000 (talk) 13:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.