Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witikon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Not enough proof that it's not a hoax to transwiki --Joann e B 10:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Witikon
Delete: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Hetar 00:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC) Hetar 00:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Was about to prod it.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC) Vote changed, see below.
 * Transwiki. -- King of Hearts talk 00:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki per nom.  WC  Quidditch  &#9742;   &#9998;  00:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Are we sure its an actual word? --Hetar 00:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I dont understand? Under What Grounds do you want it deleted? Epsilonrho 01:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Under the grounds that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, articles like this belong at Wiktionary. --Hetar 01:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

ohhk. how do you move it too wiktionary? Epsilonrho 01:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC) I think its worthy of an encyclopaedic entry. it contains some history, and is more then just a definition of a wordEpsilonrho 01:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Patent nonsense; original research.  Bucketsofg 02:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, isn't Witikon also a province in Switzerland? Anyhow, back on topic, delete this as an unverifiable dicdef-- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 05:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Ter e nce Ong 10:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - If user wants to recreate in Wiktionary, let them, but I don't think we should Transwiki a a word which may not exist. --Irishpunktom\talk 11:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not transwiki: not found in OED or on Google(other than as Swiss district) Kevin McE 11:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable Just zis Guy you know? 14:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can find no evidence this word exists. "witikus" also doesn't look anything like a Greek word. --Saforrest 15:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Witikodelete per Kevin McE. Fagstein 17:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki per nom. --Ton e 21:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fake Greek Bacchiad 22:57, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as steaming load of "Camelus-Witikon".  Dei zio  00:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd like to point out that an unpleasant comment attributed to me on this page (deleted, can be seen in history) was posted by User:Epsilonrho.  Dei zio  11:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete unless proof can be found that this is a real word (I couldn't find any). Failing that proof, it should not be transwikied. Ziggurat 04:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, if it can not be found that this is "real", then it should be deleted and not transwikied. Radagast83 05:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.