Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizards of Waverly Place: The Movie the sequal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Big Dom  13:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Wizards of Waverly Place: The Movie the sequal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, the article is completely unreferenced so even if it was noteworthy of an article at this time it fails Wikipedia's standards of verifiability.  elektrik SHOOS  05:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: this article was also previously PRODded by me, for more or less the above reasons, but was contested by an IP. This isn't really a reason for or against deletion, but it felt notable enough to mention.  elektrik SHOOS  05:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Misspelled and very unlikely title for future movie which remains unannounced for now. How many times do we have to say it; wait until the network actually issues a press release before creating an article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to first film's article (after renaming to Wizards of Waverly Place: The Movie Sequel). IMDb recognizes it as a project in development. Last real news seems to be this, mentioning the intent to start filming this summer. Per the notability guidelines for future films, it is too soon to have an article. The early details can be included at the first film's "Sequel" section. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 15:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Problem is, anyone with the right amount of convincing can add an entry to IMDb, so I'm inclined not to believe it as there is nothing besides a title in the entry. I prefer that actual PR from the studio confirms it before we get anywhere near developing an article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirects are cheap, and if it is on IMDb (a pretty popular website), it may be searched for. We can move the page history later to whatever the official title turns out to be, if filming does begin. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 20:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:GNG. There is no major official news yet. —Torchiest talkedits 17:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator JDDJS (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.