Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizards of Waverly Place spells


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   G4 by TexasAndroid, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Wizards of Waverly Place spells

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Keep - it is a sub article of Wizards of Waverly Place. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - This article has previously been created and deleted more than once. Apparently the spells addressed in this article are already included at List of Wizards of Waverly Place episodes so the article may have limited value. --AussieLegend (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete- this has been nominated for deletion again and again and, rightfully, the consensus is always overwhelmingly to delete. This article has no sources, it consists of little more than plot summary, and it is an indiscriminate collection of trivial information that has no business in a respectable encyclopedia. Delete, salt, and salt every conceivable variant of the title so that this thing doesn't come back a fourth time. Reyk  YO!  14:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, this qualifies for speedy deletion under criterion G4: it's a recreation of previously deleted material that is substantially identical to the deleted version and does not address any of the issues for which the material was deleted. So tagged. Reyk  YO!  14:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as recreation of material deleted via discussion (twice) as Reyk pointed out. Though the title is slightly different, it's the same subject as before.--Boffob (talk) 14:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Comment: where are the earlier debates? Speedy delete does not apply if there was not an AfD before. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)