Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizdom Khalifahd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Wizdom Khalifahd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing any claim to notability under WP:ENTERTAINER, WP:MUSICBIO, or WP:GNG. Ifnord (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete for suspected WP:COI and failing notability under WP:GNG Nannochloropsis (talk) 22:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:COI is not grounds for deletion. --ColinFine (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment You are correct.  I still think it is worth pointing out though, even if it has no impact on whether or not the article is deleted. Nannochloropsis (talk) 00:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete non notable. --ColinFine (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * CommentThanks you so much for considering me. Please give me some additional chance to cite more references. Thanks you so much for your reputations.Sufiabdul (talk) 23:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 03:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 03:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 03:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find anything that suggests that the subject of this article meets the guidelines for inclusion set out at WP:MUSICBIO or meets the generable notability guide. — sparklism hey! 10:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Being largely incomprehensible is not a basis for deletion, but a lack of notability is, and so makes it unnecessary to tag the article to be rewritten to address the incomprehensibility. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.