Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wo desh ki beti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Sunil Kumar Verma.  MBisanz  talk 17:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Wo desh ki beti

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable poem written by a scientist who, although marginally notable, is not noted as a poet. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Possible merge and redirect - Detailed searches through Google News provided nothing so the poem probably never received any attention and if it did, the sources may not be English. I'm willing to perform the merge if other users agree. SwisterTwister   talk  20:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment A merge based on what sources? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 15:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - NOTTRIBUTE probably applies. Non-notable newly authored poem about a tragic criminal event. Carrite (talk) 06:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge (no redirect) with Sunil Kumar Verma, that it is a departure from his scientific work appears more notable than the poem itself is (yet) and will strengthen that article by giving a wider picture of him. On this basis the primary source presents a better case than as a standalone article. Created by possible WP:SPA.—Baldy Bill (talk) 14:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I disagree with the Merge option: if Neil Degrasse Tyson had written a letter to the editor protesting gun violence in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, we would probably not note such an event in his article. Even though both Tyson and the shooting are notable, the fact that he chose to speak up on this issue that is outside his normal area of expertise is not a notable event.  The same logic applies here -- a somewhat notable scientist has reacted to a somewhat notable event by writing a completely non-notable tribute poem.  So what?  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:57, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Also: If merged, a redirect is required by Wikipedia's attribution policy, as otherwise the merged content becomes WP:COPYVIO. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.