Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wogrammer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Wogrammer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not believe this organisation meets WP:CORPDEPTH as I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. The article has been created by a single-purpose account with a likely conflict of interest. Considering it was founded in 2014, the organisation's website is feeble! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 09:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep This organization is an established non-profit organization and has been featured in multiple sources including Huffington Post, CNN Money, Bustle, and referenced by tech executives. It is now linked from the Brogrammer page, since the name is a counter to the Brogrammer slang.
 * Comment The above comment was made by user:Techhistwriter, the creator of the article. The only other substantial editor of the article is user:Wogrammer, and I think we can assume that the latter is a CoI editor. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the worthiness of the goals don't equate to notability for an organisation. I'm not seeing secondary coverage of ongoing activity to support this. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see either the neologism or the organization as being notable; it's unclear which the article is supposed to be about. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 23:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.