Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wole Ademola Adewole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Wole Ademola Adewole

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sign of WP:BASIC or WP:NACADEMIC. Having co-authored a few papers and done government consulting does not make someone automatically notable. JBchrch  talk  21:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  JBchrch   talk  21:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  JBchrch   talk  21:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  JBchrch   talk  21:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not there yet. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC).
 * Delete — Promotional article on a non notable entrepreneur who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — Clearly promotional. Deb (talk) 08:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete – nowhere near establishing sufficient notability for an article. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough independant significant coverage to meet WP:GNG, definitely doesn't meet WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet guidelines for notability. MartinWilder (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.