Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf Beats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Wolf Beats

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources can be found to establish WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Non-notable record label with non-notable artists in their history. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 01:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  01:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  01:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  01:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  01:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails GNG. What coverage exists is press releases or mere mentions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write)  01:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons in main AfD and above. Sourcing from Reddit/Facebook/Soundcloud (where the majority of the references are from) doesn't confer notability. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 02:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - no authoritative references are given to support notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Anyone knowledgeable about electronic music will understand why Wolf Beats deserves its own page. They tend to stay in the background so there are few sources, but as an avid electronic music enthusiast I can confirm that it is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.246.11.246 (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please provide valid evidence of notability, preferably reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. See WP:GNG. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 09:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - although several of the artists have blue links, all but one of them re-direct back towards the label's page. Single notable act (and it seems barely notable) is under the management company, and gets a brief, brief mention.   is the only independent source I could find.  I have no idea regarding its reliability.  Even if highly reliable, I don't think this is a notable record label, as there is no significant roster of notable artists, nor does it meet WP:GNG, nor does any source claim the label has otherwise had a significant impact on the development or history of a genre or regional musical culture.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH.  HighKing++ 13:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth sourcing to show that it passes WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.