Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang Digital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Wolfgang Digital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence for notability  that meet NC standards  DGG ( talk ) 08:56, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom, not a notable company. Spleodrach (talk) 11:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - confirmed notable company. Previously discussed and passed as newsworthy. Quickly researched additional and found additional information adding to newsworthiness 17:47, 1 May 2018 (GMT)
 * Delete, I opened the refs and read them, they are very promotional, google showing mostly primary or social websites. gnews is showing hits - but given that they are actually an advertising company this is all to be expected and I would only vote keep based upon a) them being a big company or b) critical commentary, neither of which is satisfied. Szzuk (talk) 19:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill company, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 17:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Various reports published by the firm have been quoted in media such as the Irish Times, but these fall under the "Examples of trivial coverage" point of WP:CORPDEPTH, as do the company's industry awards and appearance in local "Fast 50" lists. The previous discussion mention in the "keep" opinion above related to criterion WP:A7 which does not in itself establish a position of notability; nor is "newsworthiness" a criterion here. All in all, a company going about its business, but I am not seeing evidence of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 16:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.