Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang Dircks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  A  Train talk 09:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Wolfgang Dircks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a WP:BLP1E WP:BIO1E, albeit in a particularly sad way. Not sufficiently notable for an article. agt x 16:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

I believe it can add more on the sections of unusual deaths. Similar cases are in there, some of them still not expanded.--Julio Puentes (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 17:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Za  wl  16:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Cannot violate WP:BLP1E if they're dead. I see mentions in The Independent, Deseret News, Irish Times, Utusan via Reuters, a paragraph in Miami New Times, and a few pages in a book published by Plough Publishing House. That's multiple news articles, coming from 5 different countries (and that's only in English, there may be more in German). -- Darth Mike (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That's fair that it's not technically a BLP1E. WP:BIO1E was the correct guideline. agt x  22:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete it's not BLP1E, but the bio doesn't meet GNG. I would describe as "News of the Weird"-style newspaper filler, not significant secondary coverage. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric On leave 07:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 13:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.