Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang Galow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Wolfgang Galow

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability concerns. Doesn't meet any SNG for either photography or chess. 2100 ELO is respectable for an amateur but far below grandmaster skill. Only sourcing regarding photography appears to be his own website, no substantial coverage found. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 22:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 22:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 22:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Looking around I'm seeing a few hits on the name, but they're essentially entirely photo credits in articles about other chess-related things. The German-language page is a little bit more robust, but even then its bibliography is chiefly primary sources. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 23:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.